PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .362vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sweeper 32%Sinker 31%Cutter 24%Changeup 12%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JJ Josh Jung RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JP Joc Pederson LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Sweeper (32% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.