PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .361vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 29%Cutter 25%Changeup 13%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JJ Josh Jung RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Jung
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JP Joc Pederson LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 AO Alejandro Osuna LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alejandro Osuna
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 KH Kyle Higashioka RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Higashioka
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (25% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-20 game page →