PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .358vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 31%Cutter 24%Changeup 12%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .241 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .233 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Colton Cowser LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .234 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Carlos Narváez RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Narváez
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CE Christian Encarnacion-Strand RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Encarnacion-Strand
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.