PITCHER MATCHUP

Erick Fedde vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Erick Fedde's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Erick Fedde's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .363vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Sinker 31%Sweeper 29%Cutter 26%Changeup 13%Four-Seam Fastball 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Erick Fedde, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .300
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 PB Patrick Bailey SH .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 DF David Fry SH .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Fry
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AH Austin Hedges RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Hedges
    • Sinker (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (29% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (26% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-24 game page →