PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .269Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 30%Changeup 16%Curveball 10%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .365
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .405 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .268
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.