PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .300vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Changeup 16%Curveball 9%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Ben Rice LHB .370
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 470 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .267
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 473 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AW Austin Wells LHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Amed Rosario RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-18 game page →