PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Changeup 16%Curveball 9%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TG Trent Grisham LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 558 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .271
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.