PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Changeup 16%Curveball 9%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 473 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 691 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 596 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Alec Bohm RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BH Bryce Harper LHB .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .386 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 556 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.