PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Changeup 17%Curveball 9%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 548 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .369
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 407 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 510 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JC Justin Crawford LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 378 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 ES Edmundo Sosa RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edmundo Sosa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 182 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.