PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .301vs RHH xwOBA .286Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Changeup 17%Curveball 9%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 TW Taylor Ward RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 LT Leody Taveras SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CM Coby Mayo RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CC Colton Cowser LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TO Tyler O'Neill RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler O'Neill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (17% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.