PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .308vs RHH xwOBA .288Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 31%Changeup 16%Curveball 9%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 513 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .227 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BB Brett Baty LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 355 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 602 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JS Juan Soto LHB .403
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .436 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .379 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 JY Jared Young LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.