PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs Miami Marlins

How the Miami Marlins's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .310vs RHH xwOBA .282Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 30%Changeup 16%Curveball 9%

How the Miami Marlins's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Miami Marlins's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 OL Otto Lopez RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Otto Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 381 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jakob Marsee LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jakob Marsee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Stowers LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Stowers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 389 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JS Javier Sanoja RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Sanoja
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 HH Heriberto Hernández RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heriberto Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Owen Caissie LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Owen Caissie
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Joe Mack LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joe Mack
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 GC Griffin Conine LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Griffin Conine
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AR Agustín Ramírez RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Agustín Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →