PITCHER MATCHUP

Emmet Sheehan vs Arizona Diamondbacks

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emmet Sheehan's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emmet Sheehan's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .306vs RHH xwOBA .269Seasons 2026–2025
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Slider 30%Changeup 16%Curveball 10%

How the Arizona Diamondbacks's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Arizona Diamondbacks's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emmet Sheehan, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 CC Corbin Carroll LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corbin Carroll
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 658 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 GP Geraldo Perdomo SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Geraldo Perdomo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KM Ketel Marte SH .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ketel Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .389 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NA Nolan Arenado RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Arenado
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Gabriel Moreno RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Moreno
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 IV Ildemaro Vargas SH .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ildemaro Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TT Tim Tawa RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tim Tawa
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LN Lars Nootbaar LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lars Nootbaar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RW Ryan Waldschmidt RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan Waldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.