PITCHER MATCHUP

Emerson Hancock vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emerson Hancock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emerson Hancock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 35%Sinker 28%Sweeper 12%Changeup 11%Cutter 8%Slider 4%Curveball 2%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emerson Hancock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 542 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 507 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.