PITCHER MATCHUP

Emerson Hancock vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emerson Hancock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emerson Hancock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 35%Sinker 28%Changeup 11%Sweeper 11%Cutter 8%Slider 5%Curveball 2%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emerson Hancock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SK Steven Kwan LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 605 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 300 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 455 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 531 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 353 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (11% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.