PITCHER MATCHUP

Emerson Hancock vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emerson Hancock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emerson Hancock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .355vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 34%Sinker 29%Sweeper 12%Changeup 12%Cutter 7%Slider 5%Curveball 1%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emerson Hancock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 AP Andy Pages RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andy Pages
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MM Max Muncy LHB .366
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MB Mookie Betts RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 380 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 DR Dalton Rushing LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dalton Rushing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 AF Alex Freeland SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (34% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (29% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-29 game page →