PITCHER MATCHUP

Emerson Hancock vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Emerson Hancock's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Emerson Hancock's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .308Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 35%Sinker 28%Sweeper 12%Changeup 11%Cutter 8%Slider 4%Curveball 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Emerson Hancock, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .329
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 619 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .409 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 483 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 319 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 233 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AF Alex Freeland SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Freeland
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (35% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (2% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.