PITCHER MATCHUP

Edward Cabrera vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Edward Cabrera's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Edward Cabrera's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .350vs RHH xwOBA .298Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Changeup 28%Curveball 21%Sinker 20%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Slider 14%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Edward Cabrera, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 446 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KK Kyle Karros RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Changeup (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.