PITCHER MATCHUP

Edward Cabrera vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Edward Cabrera's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Edward Cabrera's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .351vs RHH xwOBA .293Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Changeup 29%Curveball 21%Sinker 19%Four-Seam Fastball 17%Slider 14%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Edward Cabrera, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 199 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 395 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WC Willi Castro SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willi Castro
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 458 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 EJ Edouard Julien LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edouard Julien
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TF Tyler Freeman RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Freeman
    • Changeup (29% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (21% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (19% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (17% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (14% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-16 game page →