PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 369 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 KK Kyle Karros RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .240 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-24 game page →