PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Changeup 23%Cutter 15%Sinker 8%Curveball 7%Slider 3%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SS Spencer Steer RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Steer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Matt McLain RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JB JJ Bleday LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 492 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BD Blake Dunn RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Blake Dunn
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DM Dane Myers RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.