PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 14%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 172 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 607 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 444 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 TF TJ Friedl LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Friedl
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.