PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Cincinnati Reds

How the Cincinnati Reds's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Cincinnati Reds's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cincinnati Reds's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .310
  1. 1 SS Sal Stewart RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Stewart
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ED Elly De La Cruz SH .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Elly De La Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JB JJ Bleday LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. JJ Bleday
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 459 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MM Matt McLain RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt McLain
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 283 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 ES Eugenio Suárez RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eugenio Suárez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 551 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .242 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 343 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TS Tyler Stephenson RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Stephenson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 382 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 DM Dane Myers RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dane Myers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KH Ke'Bryan Hayes RHB .280
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ke'Bryan Hayes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NM Noelvi Marte RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Noelvi Marte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.