PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Texas Rangers

How the Texas Rangers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 14%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the Texas Rangers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Texas Rangers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BN Brandon Nimmo LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Nimmo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 650 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JB Jake Burger RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Burger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ED Ezequiel Duran RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JP Joc Pederson LHB .327
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joc Pederson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 WL Wyatt Langford RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wyatt Langford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 EC Evan Carter LHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Evan Carter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CS Corey Seager LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Corey Seager
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NL Nicky Lopez LHB .283
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nicky Lopez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-13 game page →