PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Pittsburgh Pirates

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 14%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the Pittsburgh Pirates's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Pittsburgh Pirates's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 BR Bryan Reynolds SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryan Reynolds
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 552 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 260 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 BL Brandon Lowe SH .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 NG Nick Gonzales RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Gonzales
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 JM Jake Mangum SH .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Mangum
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SH Spencer Horwitz LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Horwitz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OC Oneil Cruz LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oneil Cruz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 368 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JT Jared Triolo RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jared Triolo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 371 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 KG Konnor Griffin RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Konnor Griffin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 HD Henry Davis RHB .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Davis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.