PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .354
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 386 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.