PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 508 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .415 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .291
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.