PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .322Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 487 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .363
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .423 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 349 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.