PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MC Matt Chapman RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CK Christian Koss RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.