PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .352vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 14%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 587 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 590 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CK Christian Koss RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 GM Grant McCray LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Grant McCray
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.