PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .342vs RHH xwOBA .332Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 23%Cutter 15%Sinker 8%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 549 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WA Willy Adames RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 564 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 LA Luis Arraez LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 620 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MC Matt Chapman RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 462 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EH Eric Haase RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eric Haase
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-29 game page →