PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CK Christian Koss RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC Jonah Cox RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.