PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Los Angeles Dodgers

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .348vs RHH xwOBA .326Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Los Angeles Dodgers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Dodgers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 FF Freddie Freeman LHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Freddie Freeman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KT Kyle Tucker LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Tucker
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 491 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MM Max Muncy LHB .352
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MB Mookie Betts RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mookie Betts
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TH Teoscar Hernández RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Teoscar Hernández
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 396 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TE Tommy Edman SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tommy Edman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MR Miguel Rojas RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Rojas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HF Hunter Feduccia LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Feduccia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AC Alex Call RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Call
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.