PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 586 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 518 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 409 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .349
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 340 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 435 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 306 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 SF Sal Frelick LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.