PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 690 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 525 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 430 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 540 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JJ Jim Jarvis LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jim Jarvis
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SM Sean Murphy RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sean Murphy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.