PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .347vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Curveball 9%Sinker 8%Slider 2%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 674 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 189 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .278
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 511 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .231 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MH Michael Harris II LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 410 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 246 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Austin Riley RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 492 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 531 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DS Dominic Smith LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.