PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .331Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 44%Changeup 23%Cutter 15%Sinker 8%Curveball 7%Slider 3%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 419 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 262 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 206 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 ZN Zach Neto RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .237 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 255 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MT Mike Trout RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 476 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 LO Logan O'Hoppe RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Logan O'Hoppe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 4 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 3 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DW Donovan Walton LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Donovan Walton
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (44% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (23% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-17 game page →