PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .329Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 15%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 417 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JA Jo Adell RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 NS Nolan Schanuel SH .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nolan Schanuel
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MT Mike Trout RHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 432 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JS Jorge Soler RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Soler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 314 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 224 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JL Josh Lowe LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WM Wade Meckler LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (2% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.