PITCHER MATCHUP

Eduardo Rodriguez vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Eduardo Rodriguez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Eduardo Rodriguez's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .344vs RHH xwOBA .320Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 43%Changeup 24%Cutter 14%Sinker 9%Curveball 8%Slider 2%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Eduardo Rodriguez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (43% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (24% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.