PITCHER MATCHUP

Edgardo Henriquez vs Boston Red Sox

How the Boston Red Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Edgardo Henriquez's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Edgardo Henriquez's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .285vs RHH xwOBA .214Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 33%Sinker 25%Slider 22%Cutter 15%Curveball 5%

How the Boston Red Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Boston Red Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Edgardo Henriquez, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 WA Wilyer Abreu LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wilyer Abreu
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JD Jarren Duran LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jarren Duran
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 639 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Caleb Durbin RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Caleb Durbin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 WC Willson Contreras RHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willson Contreras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AR Adley Rutschman SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Adley Rutschman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 AM Andruw Monasterio RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andruw Monasterio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 181 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TS Trevor Story RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trevor Story
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CW Connor Wong RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Wong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 252 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 NS Nick Sogard SH .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Sogard
    • Four-Seam Fastball (33% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (25% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (15% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.