PITCHER MATCHUP

Dylan Cease vs Chicago Cubs

How the Chicago Cubs's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dylan Cease's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dylan Cease's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .284vs RHH xwOBA .273Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 40%Slider 36%Knuckle Curve 9%Changeup 6%Sinker 6%Sweeper 4%

How the Chicago Cubs's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago Cubs's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dylan Cease, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 NH Nico Hoerner RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nico Hoerner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 594 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PC Pete Crow-Armstrong LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Crow-Armstrong
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alex Bregman RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alex Bregman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 MB Michael Busch LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Busch
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 612 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DS Dansby Swanson RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dansby Swanson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 271 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 316 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PR Pedro Ramírez SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pedro Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MA Miguel Amaya RHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Amaya
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 MS Matt Shaw RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Shaw
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 GA Gabriel Arias RHB .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gabriel Arias
    • Four-Seam Fastball (40% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (36% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Knuckle Curve (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.