PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Anderson vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Anderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Anderson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .265vs RHH xwOBA .321Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Changeup 31%Curveball 23%Slider 5%Sinker 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Anderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 289 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 415 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EQ Edgar Quero SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Edgar Quero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-16 game page →