PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Anderson vs Washington Nationals

How the Washington Nationals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Anderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Anderson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .275vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Changeup 31%Curveball 22%Slider 5%Sinker 1%

How the Washington Nationals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Washington Nationals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Anderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .308
  1. 1 DL Daylen Lile LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daylen Lile
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 270 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CA CJ Abrams LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. CJ Abrams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 501 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW James Wood LHB .358
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. James Wood
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .437 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 214 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 NN Nasim Nuñez SH .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nasim Nuñez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 228 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 JY Jacob Young RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dylan Crews RHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Crews
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 KR Keibert Ruiz SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Keibert Ruiz
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 BH Brady House RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brady House
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JV Jorbit Vivas LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorbit Vivas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-22 game page →