PITCHER MATCHUP

Drew Anderson vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Drew Anderson's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Drew Anderson's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .275vs RHH xwOBA .324Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 41%Changeup 31%Curveball 22%Slider 5%Sinker 1%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Drew Anderson, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .323
  1. 1 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 493 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 310 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JN Josh Naylor LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 248 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CY Cole Young LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 205 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TW Taylor Ward RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 558 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .391 xwOBA over 256 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CR Cal Raleigh SH .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 636 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 312 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 538 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WW Weston Wilson RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Weston Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (41% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (22% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (5% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.