PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Splitter 22%Cutter 20%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Unknown 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .322
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .359
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .416 xwOBA over 348 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 231 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 356 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 588 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 532 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 TG Trent Grisham LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trent Grisham
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC José Caballero RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 366 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 447 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .385 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AW Austin Wells LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.