PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 17%Curveball 13%Unknown 1%Slider 1%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .330
  1. 1 BR Ben Rice LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 328 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LG Luis García Jr. LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis García Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .382 xwOBA over 346 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 295 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 HR Heliot Ramos RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Heliot Ramos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 427 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 315 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 276 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AW Austin Wells LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Wells
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 503 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AJ Aaron Judge RHB .398
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Aaron Judge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .441 xwOBA over 414 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .483 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-14 game page →