PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Splitter 22%Cutter 20%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Unknown 1%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .315
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 526 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 322 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .403 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 357 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 156 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 448 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 BD Brenton Doyle RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brenton Doyle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 425 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.