PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 18%Curveball 13%Unknown 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .317
  1. 1 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 441 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 253 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .399 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 418 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MM Munetaka Murakami LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Munetaka Murakami
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 BM Braden Montgomery SH .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Braden Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.