PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Chicago White Sox

How the Chicago White Sox's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .299Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 18%Curveball 12%Unknown 2%

How the Chicago White Sox's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Chicago White Sox's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 CM Chase Meidroth RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase Meidroth
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MV Miguel Vargas RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Miguel Vargas
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CM Colson Montgomery LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colson Montgomery
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .398 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AB Andrew Benintendi LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Benintendi
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 394 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 SA Sam Antonacci LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sam Antonacci
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TP Tristan Peters LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tristan Peters
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 LA Luisangel Acuña RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luisangel Acuña
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 RG Randal Grichuk RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randal Grichuk
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DR Drew Romo SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Romo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-01 game page →