PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .320vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 17%Curveball 13%Unknown 1%Slider 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 311 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .344
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 547 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .387 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 411 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 429 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 509 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JB Javier Báez SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.