PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Kansas City Royals

How the Kansas City Royals's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Splitter 22%Cutter 20%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Unknown 1%

How the Kansas City Royals's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Kansas City Royals's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 SP Salvador Perez RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Salvador Perez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 482 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BW Bobby Witt Jr. RHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bobby Witt Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 517 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 333 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 CJ Carter Jensen LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carter Jensen
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jac Caglianone LHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jac Caglianone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 IC Isaac Collins SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Isaac Collins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 406 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MM Michael Massey LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Massey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 376 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 VP Vinnie Pasquantino LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vinnie Pasquantino
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 592 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nick Loftin RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Loftin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 241 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MG Maikel Garcia RHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Maikel Garcia
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 347 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.