PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Splitter 22%Cutter 20%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 504 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .355
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 621 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .378 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .433 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BH Bryce Harper LHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 465 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 275 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BS Bryson Stott LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 583 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 484 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JC Justin Crawford LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH Derek Hill RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Derek Hill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.