PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 18%Curveball 13%Unknown 2%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .321
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 456 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 329 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 667 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AB Alec Bohm RHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .362
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .369 xwOBA over 569 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .436 xwOBA over 292 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BH Bryce Harper LHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .388 xwOBA over 422 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 250 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BS Bryson Stott LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 531 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 244 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-16 game page →