PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Philadelphia Phillies

How the Philadelphia Phillies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .304Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Splitter 22%Cutter 20%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Unknown 1%

How the Philadelphia Phillies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Philadelphia Phillies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 TT Trea Turner RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Trea Turner
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 499 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 351 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LA Luis Arraez LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Luis Arraez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 719 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 KS Kyle Schwarber LHB .356
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Schwarber
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 620 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 150 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .432 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 BH Bryce Harper LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Harper
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .390 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 274 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 AB Alec Bohm RHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alec Bohm
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 384 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 BS Bryson Stott LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryson Stott
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 578 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 BM Brandon Marsh LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brandon Marsh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 216 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Justin Crawford LHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Justin Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JR J.T. Realmuto RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.T. Realmuto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 284 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.