PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .300Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 18%Curveball 13%Unknown 2%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 533 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .351
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 367 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Colton Cowser LHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 364 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .393 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TO Tyler O'Neill RHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler O'Neill
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CN Carlos Narváez RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Narváez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-10 game page →