PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Baltimore Orioles

How the Baltimore Orioles's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 28%Splitter 22%Cutter 20%Sinker 17%Curveball 12%Unknown 1%

How the Baltimore Orioles's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Baltimore Orioles's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .318
  1. 1 GH Gunnar Henderson LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gunnar Henderson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 PA Pete Alonso RHB .357
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Pete Alonso
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .396 xwOBA over 547 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .394 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 LT Leody Taveras SH .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Leody Taveras
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over 403 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CM Coby Mayo RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Coby Mayo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 CC Colton Cowser LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colton Cowser
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .244 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .411 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Dylan Beavers LHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dylan Beavers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JJ Jeremiah Jackson RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeremiah Jackson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Carlos Narváez RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Narváez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CE Christian Encarnacion-Strand RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Encarnacion-Strand
    • Four-Seam Fastball (28% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (12% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.