PITCHER MATCHUP

Dean Kremer vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Dean Kremer's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Dean Kremer's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .309Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 27%Splitter 22%Cutter 19%Sinker 17%Curveball 13%Unknown 1%Slider 1%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Dean Kremer, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .343
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (22% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (13% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-20 game page →