PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs New York Yankees

How the New York Yankees's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Changeup 20%Slider 18%Sinker 13%Curveball 8%Cutter 7%Sweeper 4%

How the New York Yankees's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Yankees's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 CB Cody Bellinger LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cody Bellinger
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 498 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 164 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JC Jazz Chisholm Jr. LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jazz Chisholm Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Ben Rice LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ben Rice
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .410 xwOBA over 261 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .373 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JC José Caballero RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Caballero
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 RM Ryan McMahon LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ryan McMahon
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 461 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 PG Paul Goldschmidt RHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Paul Goldschmidt
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 187 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AR Amed Rosario RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Amed Rosario
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 JE J.C. Escarra LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.C. Escarra
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Anthony Volpe RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Anthony Volpe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 397 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .247 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .256 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 235 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-06-16 game page →