PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs Colorado Rockies

How the Colorado Rockies's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .353vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Changeup 19%Slider 17%Sinker 14%Curveball 10%Cutter 8%Sweeper 3%Unknown 1%

How the Colorado Rockies's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Colorado Rockies's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .311
  1. 1 TR TJ Rumfield LHB .323
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. TJ Rumfield
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JM Jake McCarthy LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake McCarthy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 370 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 HG Hunter Goodman RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hunter Goodman
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 372 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 ET Ezequiel Tovar RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ezequiel Tovar
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 453 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 KK Kyle Karros RHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Karros
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 MM Mickey Moniak LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mickey Moniak
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 393 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 197 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 TJ Troy Johnston LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Troy Johnston
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 73 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 CN Connor Norby RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Connor Norby
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 166 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CC Cole Carrigg SH .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Carrigg
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-26 game page →