PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .354vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Changeup 19%Slider 16%Sinker 14%Curveball 10%Cutter 8%Sweeper 3%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 334 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 672 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 338 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 439 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 230 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 490 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 352 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 39 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .248 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 413 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (16% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (3% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.