PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .346vs RHH xwOBA .302Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Changeup 20%Slider 18%Sinker 13%Curveball 8%Cutter 7%Sweeper 4%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 358 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 563 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 175 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 285 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 74 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .321
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 297 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 16 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .246 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .219 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 PB Patrick Bailey SH .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 359 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .253 xwOBA over 148 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 78 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 DF David Fry SH .285
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Fry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-02 game page →