PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .359vs RHH xwOBA .310Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Changeup 19%Slider 17%Sinker 14%Curveball 9%Cutter 8%Sweeper 4%Unknown 1%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 472 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 398 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 137 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 179 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SK Steven Kwan LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 301 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .332
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 457 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 321 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 28 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 536 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 354 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (17% usage) projects to .252 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .235 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.