PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 29%Changeup 19%Slider 18%Sinker 13%Curveball 9%Cutter 8%Sweeper 4%Unknown 1%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .320
  1. 1 OA Ozzie Albies SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 445 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 221 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MO Matt Olson LHB .337
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 609 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 236 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 298 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .294
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 208 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AR Austin Riley RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 428 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 232 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .364 xwOBA over 96 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MH Michael Harris II LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 383 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .374 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DB Drake Baldwin LHB .334
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drake Baldwin
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 494 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 154 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 184 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DS Dominic Smith LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 RA Ronald Acuña Jr. RHB .345
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ronald Acuña Jr.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 282 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (19% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .431 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (9% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.