PITCHER MATCHUP

Davis Martin vs Atlanta Braves

How the Atlanta Braves's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Davis Martin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Davis Martin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .349vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Changeup 20%Slider 18%Sinker 13%Curveball 8%Cutter 7%Sweeper 4%

How the Atlanta Braves's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Atlanta Braves's top-9-by-AB hitters against Davis Martin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .314
  1. 1 MO Matt Olson LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Olson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 565 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .383 xwOBA over 272 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 158 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 OA Ozzie Albies SH .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Ozzie Albies
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 404 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 198 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .250 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 AR Austin Riley RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Austin Riley
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 391 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 210 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 MD Mauricio Dubón RHB .290
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mauricio Dubón
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 324 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 MH Michael Harris II LHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Michael Harris II
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .354 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 174 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 234 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 MY Mike Yastrzemski LHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Yastrzemski
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 471 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 125 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 DS Dominic Smith LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Smith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 63 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .356 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JM Jorge Mateo RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jorge Mateo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .268 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 EW Eli White RHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Eli White
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (20% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (18% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.