PITCHER MATCHUP

David Sandlin vs Detroit Tigers

How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against David Sandlin's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

David Sandlin's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .345vs RHH xwOBA .252Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Curveball 23%Cutter 20%Sweeper 12%Sinker 9%Changeup 6%Unknown 1%

How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against David Sandlin, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .324
  1. 1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .342
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .371 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .367 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .245 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .366 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RG Riley Greene LHB .364
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .368 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .402 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .254 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Colt Keith LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .229 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .304
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JB Javier Báez SH .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MC Max Clark LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Clark
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (23% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 12 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (20% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (12% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (9% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 40 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (6% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.