PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .321vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026
Four-Seam Fastball 30%Slider 29%Curveball 18%Changeup 13%Sinker 10%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .303
  1. 1 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 365 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 SK Steven Kwan LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 570 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 178 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 286 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 36 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 46 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 KM Kyle Manzardo LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kyle Manzardo
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 DS Daniel Schneemann LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Daniel Schneemann
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 273 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 RH Rhys Hoskins RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rhys Hoskins
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 332 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 180 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 219 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 PB Patrick Bailey SH .289
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 361 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DF David Fry SH .281
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Fry
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (29% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (13% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (10% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-08 game page →