PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs Cleveland Guardians

How the Cleveland Guardians's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .343vs RHH xwOBA .317Seasons 2026
Slider 31%Four-Seam Fastball 29%Curveball 17%Sinker 13%Changeup 11%

How the Cleveland Guardians's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Cleveland Guardians's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .312
  1. 1 JA Jo Adell RHB .340
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jo Adell
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .375 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 474 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 303 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 BR Brayan Rocchio SH .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brayan Rocchio
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 401 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 183 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 209 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CD Chase DeLauter LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Chase DeLauter
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 SK Steven Kwan LHB .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Steven Kwan
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 194 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 617 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 305 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 185 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JR José Ramírez SH .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. José Ramírez
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 460 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 323 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 TB Travis Bazzana LHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Travis Bazzana
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 AM Angel Martínez SH .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Angel Martínez
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 288 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 NL Nathaniel Lowe LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nathaniel Lowe
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 541 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 PB Patrick Bailey SH .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Patrick Bailey
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (29% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 390 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (11% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.