PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .323vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026
Slider 31%Four-Seam Fastball 26%Curveball 18%Sinker 15%Changeup 10%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .377 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 163 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 442 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 WA Willy Adames RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Willy Adames
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 597 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 127 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 CS Casey Schmitt RHB .322
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Casey Schmitt
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 132 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 247 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .395 xwOBA over 129 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .312
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 33 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 MC Matt Chapman RHB .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Matt Chapman
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 327 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 116 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 CK Christian Koss RHB .295
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (26% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (18% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (15% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.