PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026
Slider 31%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Curveball 17%Sinker 14%Changeup 10%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .306
  1. 1 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 MM Marcelo Mayer LHB .298
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcelo Mayer
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 CK Christian Koss RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 59 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JC Jonah Cox RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 66 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .303
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 21 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 VB Victor Bericoto RHB .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Victor Bericoto
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 TH Turner Hill LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Turner Hill
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 38 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-23 game page →