PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .328vs RHH xwOBA .306Seasons 2026
Slider 31%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Curveball 17%Sinker 14%Changeup 10%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .309
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 580 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 287 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 207 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 318 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 515 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 402 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 168 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JC Jackson Chourio SH .316
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 263 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 443 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 326 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JB Jake Bauers LHB .339
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .380 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .352 xwOBA over 165 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 108 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 111 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 265 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 123 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .306
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .262 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 408 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 240 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 107 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 433 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  8. 8 SF Sal Frelick LHB .292
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Sal Frelick
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 169 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 280 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 DH David Hamilton LHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .255 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 290 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 134 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.