PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs Milwaukee Brewers

How the Milwaukee Brewers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .324vs RHH xwOBA .316Seasons 2026
Slider 30%Four-Seam Fastball 30%Curveball 17%Changeup 12%Sinker 12%

How the Milwaukee Brewers's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Milwaukee Brewers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .313
  1. 1 BT Brice Turang LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brice Turang
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .327 xwOBA over 530 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 266 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 WC William Contreras RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. William Contreras
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 473 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 149 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JB Jake Bauers LHB .325
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jake Bauers
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .340 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  4. 4 JC Jackson Chourio SH .318
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jackson Chourio
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 237 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 400 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 119 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 293 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 GM Garrett Mitchell LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Garrett Mitchell
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 93 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 222 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 106 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 CY Christian Yelich LHB .313
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Yelich
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 79 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 213 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 JO Joey Ortiz RHB .293
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Joey Ortiz
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 211 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 388 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 277 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DH David Hamilton LHB .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. David Hamilton
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 AV Andrew Vaughn RHB .338
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Andrew Vaughn
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 188 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .384 xwOBA over 363 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (12% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-08-09 game page →