PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .316vs RHH xwOBA .319Seasons 2026
Slider 30%Four-Seam Fastball 30%Curveball 17%Changeup 12%Sinker 11%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 SL Shea Langeliers RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shea Langeliers
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 257 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 426 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 254 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 NK Nick Kurtz LHB .346
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Nick Kurtz
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .392 xwOBA over 251 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 170 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  3. 3 TS Tyler Soderstrom LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Tyler Soderstrom
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 317 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 218 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .309
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 167 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 440 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 145 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 452 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .289 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 212 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 76 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 268 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .315
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 43 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 HB Henry Bolte RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  9. 9 JH Jonah Heim SH .287
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Slider (30% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (30% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 424 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (12% usage) projects to .272 xwOBA over 177 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (11% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-07-26 game page →