PITCHER MATCHUP

Connor Prielipp vs Los Angeles Angels

How the Los Angeles Angels's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Connor Prielipp's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Connor Prielipp's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .331vs RHH xwOBA .311Seasons 2026
Slider 31%Four-Seam Fastball 27%Curveball 17%Sinker 14%Changeup 10%

How the Los Angeles Angels's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Los Angeles Angels's top-9-by-AB hitters against Connor Prielipp, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .305
  1. 1 ZN Zach Neto RHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach Neto
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 294 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 468 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 342 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  2. 2 MT Mike Trout RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mike Trout
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 131 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 512 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 195 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 100 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 VG Vaughn Grissom RHB .308
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Vaughn Grissom
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .336 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 OP Oswald Peraza RHB .284
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Oswald Peraza
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .275 xwOBA over 161 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 MB Moisés Ballesteros LHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Moisés Ballesteros
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 110 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 44 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 JL Josh Lowe LHB .301
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Lowe
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 331 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 90 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 140 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .342 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  7. 7 WM Wade Meckler LHB .300
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Wade Meckler
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 98 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 DG Denzer Guzman RHB .288
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Denzer Guzman
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 69 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 JS Jose Siri RHB .319
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jose Siri
    • Slider (31% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Four-Seam Fastball (27% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 200 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (17% usage) projects to .281 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (14% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 103 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (10% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-18 game page →