PITCHER MATCHUP
Colin Rea vs Detroit Tigers
How the Detroit Tigers's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Colin Rea's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.
Colin Rea's arsenal
Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .356vs RHH xwOBA .323Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sinker 13%Splitter 11%Sweeper 10%Slider 9%Cutter 9%Curveball 7%Changeup 4%
How the Detroit Tigers's regulars project
Projected expected wOBA for each of the Detroit Tigers's top-9-by-AB hitters against Colin Rea, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.
Lineup avg xwOBA .323
-
1 KM Kevin McGonigle LHB .339
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Kevin McGonigle
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .353 xwOBA over 136 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .365 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
2 DD Dillon Dingler RHB .335
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dillon Dingler
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .362 xwOBA over 325 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .350 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 115 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 141 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
3 ST Spencer Torkelson RHB .312
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Spencer Torkelson
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 463 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 320 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 159 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .257 xwOBA over 242 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 65 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 160 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
4 RG Riley Greene LHB .346
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Riley Greene
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 566 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .361 xwOBA over 278 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .326 xwOBA over 105 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .344 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .381 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 104 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 279 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
5 CK Colt Keith LHB .327
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Colt Keith
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 420 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 202 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 81 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 75 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 153 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 138 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .349 xwOBA over 83 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .258 xwOBA over 238 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
6 ZM Zach McKinstry LHB .296
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zach McKinstry
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 434 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .338 xwOBA over 186 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .265 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 67 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
-
7 GT Gleyber Torres RHB .333
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Gleyber Torres
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .376 xwOBA over 523 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 308 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .284 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 142 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 85 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .283 xwOBA over 151 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
8 HL Hao-Yu Lee RHB .313
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Hao-Yu Lee
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 109 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 45 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
-
9 JB Javier Báez SH .303
Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Javier Báez
- Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 220 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sinker (13% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 133 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Splitter (11% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 130 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Slider (9% usage) projects to .243 xwOBA over 171 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
- Cutter (9% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Curveball (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
- Changeup (4% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 94 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.