PITCHER MATCHUP

Colin Rea vs San Francisco Giants

How the San Francisco Giants's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Colin Rea's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Colin Rea's arsenal

Throws RHPvs LHH xwOBA .357vs RHH xwOBA .325Seasons 2026–2025–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 38%Sinker 13%Splitter 11%Sweeper 10%Slider 9%Cutter 8%Curveball 7%Changeup 4%

How the San Francisco Giants's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the San Francisco Giants's top-9-by-AB hitters against Colin Rea, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .316
  1. 1 RD Rafael Devers LHB .347
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Rafael Devers
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 624 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 309 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 112 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 226 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .359 xwOBA over 162 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .397 xwOBA over 102 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 204 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 JH Jung Hoo Lee LHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jung Hoo Lee
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .329 xwOBA over 431 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 217 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 157 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 88 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 84 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 135 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 BE Bryce Eldridge LHB .348
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bryce Eldridge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .413 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 80 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .270 xwOBA over 42 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .321 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 50 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 DG Drew Gilbert LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Gilbert
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 152 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 57 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 11 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 32 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .264 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  5. 5 CK Christian Koss RHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Christian Koss
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 101 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 34 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .273 xwOBA over 51 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 24 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 13 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 29 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 DC Drew Cavanaugh LHB .302
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Drew Cavanaugh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 2 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .322 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over 15 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 OB Osleivis Basabe RHB .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Osleivis Basabe
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .333 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .325 xwOBA over limited BIP — a roughly even matchup (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .331 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .292 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 19 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC Jonah Cox RHB .286
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Cox
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .271 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .211 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 7 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .332 xwOBA over 5 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 14 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 SW Shay Whitcomb RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Shay Whitcomb
    • Four-Seam Fastball (38% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Sinker (13% usage) projects to .300 xwOBA over 31 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Splitter (11% usage) projects to .251 xwOBA over limited BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher (zone profile imputed from overall vs-handedness wOBA — limited per-pitch-type data).
    • Sweeper (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 25 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 20 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Cutter (8% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 9 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 6 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (4% usage) projects to .294 xwOBA over 17 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.