PITCHER MATCHUP

Cody Bradford vs New York Mets

How the New York Mets's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cody Bradford's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cody Bradford's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .369vs RHH xwOBA .307Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Changeup 30%Slider 9%Curveball 7%

How the New York Mets's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the New York Mets's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cody Bradford, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .336
  1. 1 BB Bo Bichette RHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Bo Bichette
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .328 xwOBA over 360 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 143 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .372 xwOBA over 291 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 CB Carson Benge LHB .329
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carson Benge
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 193 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .320 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 71 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 41 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 MS Marcus Semien RHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Marcus Semien
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 528 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .317 xwOBA over 144 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .259 xwOBA over 296 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .302 xwOBA over 72 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 AE A.J. Ewing LHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. A.J. Ewing
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .358 xwOBA over 117 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 60 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 55 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 26 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 BB Brett Baty LHB .336
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Brett Baty
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 374 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .341 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .295 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  6. 6 FL Francisco Lindor SH .320
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Lindor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 626 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 249 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .312 xwOBA over 223 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .266 xwOBA over 146 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  7. 7 JS Juan Soto LHB .402
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Juan Soto
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .450 xwOBA over 481 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .360 xwOBA over 215 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 259 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 122 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  8. 8 FA Francisco Alvarez RHB .335
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Francisco Alvarez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .363 xwOBA over 258 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .309 xwOBA over 77 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .298 xwOBA over 176 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 54 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 MV Mark Vientos RHB .331
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Mark Vientos
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .348 xwOBA over 299 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 128 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (9% usage) projects to .335 xwOBA over 196 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (7% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 70 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-23 game page →