PITCHER MATCHUP

Cody Bradford vs Seattle Mariners

How the Seattle Mariners's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cody Bradford's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cody Bradford's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .373vs RHH xwOBA .312Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 53%Changeup 30%Curveball 8%Slider 8%

How the Seattle Mariners's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Seattle Mariners's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cody Bradford, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .328
  1. 1 JR Julio Rodríguez RHB .341
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Julio Rodríguez
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .343 xwOBA over 477 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .345 xwOBA over 190 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 92 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .357 xwOBA over 307 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  2. 2 JN Josh Naylor LHB .324
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Josh Naylor
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 520 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .297 xwOBA over 243 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 87 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .249 xwOBA over 239 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  3. 3 CY Cole Young LHB .310
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cole Young
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .315 xwOBA over 264 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .296 xwOBA over 97 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 35 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .311 xwOBA over 95 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 RA Randy Arozarena RHB .326
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Randy Arozarena
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .355 xwOBA over 568 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 201 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .324 xwOBA over 91 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 281 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 TW Taylor Ward RHB .328
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Taylor Ward
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .370 xwOBA over 553 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .278 xwOBA over 147 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .306 xwOBA over 89 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .267 xwOBA over 302 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 DC Dominic Canzone LHB .360
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Dominic Canzone
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .400 xwOBA over 245 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .307 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CR Cal Raleigh SH .330
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Cal Raleigh
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .347 xwOBA over 622 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 304 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .290 xwOBA over 121 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .310 xwOBA over 192 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 JC J.P. Crawford LHB .333
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. J.P. Crawford
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .346 xwOBA over 521 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 124 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 53 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .303 xwOBA over 203 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  9. 9 WW Weston Wilson RHB .297
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Weston Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (53% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 114 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (30% usage) projects to .277 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (8% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (8% usage) projects to .280 xwOBA over 49 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

Next scheduled meeting: 2026-09-09 game page →