PITCHER MATCHUP

Cody Bradford vs Athletics

How the Athletics's current regulars (top 9 by at-bats) project against Cody Bradford's season-to-date arsenal — not the posted lineup for any single game.

Cody Bradford's arsenal

Throws LHPvs LHH xwOBA .357vs RHH xwOBA .313Seasons 2026–2024
Four-Seam Fastball 51%Changeup 31%Curveball 10%Slider 7%

How the Athletics's regulars project

Projected expected wOBA for each of the Athletics's top-9-by-AB hitters against Cody Bradford, by batting order. A season-to-date read — lower favors the pitcher.

Lineup avg xwOBA .300
  1. 1 JM Jeff McNeil LHB .311
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jeff McNeil
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .318 xwOBA over 450 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 113 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 61 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 173 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  2. 2 LB Lawrence Butler LHB .299
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Lawrence Butler
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .304 xwOBA over 464 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .282 xwOBA over 229 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .319 xwOBA over 58 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 155 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  3. 3 JW Jacob Wilson RHB .305
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jacob Wilson
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .316 xwOBA over 225 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .288 xwOBA over 82 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .279 xwOBA over 18 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .339 xwOBA over 139 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  4. 4 HB Henry Bolte RHB .307
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Henry Bolte
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .313 xwOBA over 64 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .287 xwOBA over 23 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .334 xwOBA over 10 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .308 xwOBA over 37 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  5. 5 JH Jonah Heim SH .282
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Jonah Heim
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .293 xwOBA over 449 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .263 xwOBA over 191 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .305 xwOBA over 56 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .261 xwOBA over 120 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
  6. 6 ZG Zack Gelof RHB .273
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Zack Gelof
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .269 xwOBA over 267 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 86 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .276 xwOBA over 48 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 126 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  7. 7 CC Carlos Cortes LHB .317
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Carlos Cortes
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .337 xwOBA over 99 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .291 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .285 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .330 xwOBA over 47 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
  8. 8 MM Max Muncy RHB .314
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Max Muncy
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .323 xwOBA over 118 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .301 xwOBA over 52 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .286 xwOBA over 22 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .351 xwOBA over 68 BIP — a meaningful edge for the batter.
  9. 9 AW Alika Williams RHB .296
    Pitch-by-pitch projection vs. Alika Williams
    • Four-Seam Fastball (51% usage) projects to .314 xwOBA over 62 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Changeup (31% usage) projects to .274 xwOBA over 27 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
    • Curveball (10% usage) projects to .299 xwOBA over 8 BIP — a roughly even matchup.
    • Slider (7% usage) projects to .260 xwOBA over 30 BIP — a clear edge for the pitcher.
Full pitch-by-pitch breakdown, with pitch-zone heatmaps →

No meeting currently scheduled — this is a durable season matchup read.